Relative Affluence and Child Labor—Explaining a Paradox

نویسندگان

چکیده

Some micro level empirical studies questioned the validity of poverty hypothesis child labour. In some cases labour incidence found to be increasing even with improvement in economic conditions poor. This paper provides a possible explanation as why increase absolute income may not sufficient solve problem labour, at least cases. We argue that people general are just concerned about their own consumption; they very much affected by consumption peers. While taking decisions regarding time allocation children between work and leisure, parents do keep an eye on relative position society. have situation where poor is but society deteriorating this lead work. develop theoretical model household decision making show supply from family can improvements its if family’s deteriorates concern effect sufficiently strong.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Two-Child Paradox: Dichotomy and Ambiguity

Given that one of the children in a two-child family is a boy, what are the chances that the other is also a boy. The intuitive answer is 50 : 50. More careful investigation leads us to a 1-in-3 chance. We investigate circumstances under which these answers are correct. The imposition of further conditions yields some very surprising results. To my sons Owen and Andrew, both born on Tuesday, on...

متن کامل

Social Inequalities in Obesity Persist in the Nordic Region Despite Its Relative Affluence and Equity

Social inequalities in overweight and obesity (OWOB) have persisted in the affluent and reputedly egalitarian Nordic countries. In this review we examine associations between socioeconomic position (SEP) and OWOB, and secular trends in such associations. Determinants and possible causes of the relations are discussed together with opportunities to cope with OWOB as a public health problem. The ...

متن کامل

Paradox and Relativism

Since the time of Plato, relativism has been attacked as a self-refuting theory. Today, there are two basic kinds of argument that are used to show that global relativism is logically incoherent: first, a direct descendent of the argument Plato uses against Protagoras, called the peritrope; and, second, a more recent argument that relativism leads to an infinite regress. Although some relativis...

متن کامل

A relative extending module and torsion precovers

We first characterize $tau$-complemented modules with relative (pre)-covers. We also introduce an extending module relative to $tau$-pure submodules on a hereditary torsion theory $tau$ and give its relationship with $tau$-complemented modules.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Review of Development Economics

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1467-9361', '1363-6669']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12932